
I've been working on my new manuscript for submission and in the process have become addicted to buying children's books. My earlier post on
Zen Shorts shows my current favorite...and most recent buy. When I used to log into amazon, it would present me with my usual top picks on improv, training and teaching strategies, and therapy through play...now I get things like
The Incredible Book-Eating Boy. I will say that this is not an inexpensive addiction, and if I really want that DY ring, I should stop spending my extra cash on Eric Carle and save my pennies for my more materialistic passions.
I think it's fascinating because children's books are written by adults...and similar to some improv theories, these books provide really meaty underlying subtext within the story which is meant for children to pick up. But is it really? I mean, children don't actually
read children's books...adults do. Children look at the pictures and listen to the story, but are they processing all the advice, hidden meanings, and morals presented to them? Us adults like to think they are getting it...really grasping concepts like racism, disability, economic struggle in their new and innocent brains. At school, after reading a story, lets say about racism, I often present concepts like this, "Friends, Jimmy didn't want Jake to play at his house just because he was a different color, isn't that so sad?" And usually the response is twelve (well, 10 responsive) little heads nodding "yes, that's terrible" in a sheer disappointed fashion.
Children are smart. I think we are just not sure how smart sometimes. Adults underestimate and overestimate children's abilities all the time...so we have to make up for it through consistency. Which means we have to keep writing this books so that they teach a hefty lesson, and if some kids get it - great! - if not - Oh well, we tried...right?